Previous Engagements

 

Selected Previous Engagements

  

Television appearances

  • Oprah Winfrey Show
  • Bill Moyers, In Conversation with
  • KTLA, Los Angeles
  • KRON, San Francisco
  • Al Jazeera, The Riz Kjhan Show
  • The News Hour with Jim Lehrer
  • Ariana TV
  • Noor TV

Radio Shows

  • The Michael Krasny show, KQED
  • The Ronn Owens Show, KGO
  • The Gene Burns Show, KGO
  • World History Through Islamic Eyes, a 6-week series on KALW
  • NPR stations around the country

Speaking Engagements

  • Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
  • Dartmouth University, Hanover, New Hampshire
  • Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
  • Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts
  • Reed College, Portland, Oregon
  • Albion College, Albion, Michigan
  • Carleton College, Northfield, Minnesotta
  • Mills College, Oakland, CA
  • Baylor University, Waco Texas
  • Central Washington University, Ellensburg, Washington
  • University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
  • University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
  • University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
  • University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • U.S. Air Force Special Operations School, Hurlburt Field, FL
  • California State University, Hayward, CA
  • Sonoma State University, Sonoma, CA
  • Albertus Magnus College, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Cy-Fair College, Cypress, Texas
  • Ferrum College, Ferrum, West Virginia
  • LaGuardia Community College (CUNY), New York, NY
  • College of Alameda, Alameda, CA
  • Flathead Valley Community College, Kalispell, Montana
  • Houston Community College, Houston, Texas
  • Canada College, Redwood City,  CA
  • Lee College, Baytown, Texas
  • McLennan Community College, Waco, TX
  • Paradise Valley Community College, Phoenix, AZ
  • San Francisco City College, San Francisco
  • Union College, Barbourville, Kentucky
  • Berkeley High School, Berkeley, CA
  • Lick Wilmerding High School, San Francisco, CA
  • The Lovett School, Atlanta, GA
  • The Urban School, San Francisco, CA
  • Colorado Rocky Mountain School, Carbondale, Colorado
  • Washington High School, San Francisco, CA
  • Carmel Authors and Ideas Festival, Carmel, CA
  • Colorado Association of Teachers of Foreign Languages 
  • The Asian Art Museum, San Francisco, CA
  • World Affairs Council of San Francisco, CA
  • World Affairs Council, Houston, TX
  • Commonwealth Club of Northern California
  • Japanese Cultural and Community Center of Northern California
  • Juniper Creek Writers Conference, Carson City, NV
  • Books by the Bay, San Francisco, CA
  • Afghan Public Library Foundation, San Jose, CA
  • Los Angeles Public Library, Los Angeles
  • Mechanics Institute Library, San Francisco, CA
  • San Francisco Library, various branches
  • Berkeley Public Library, Berkeley, CA
  • Larkspur Library, Larkspur, CA
  • Pleasanton Public Library, Pleasanton, , CA
  • Redwood City Libraries
  • Foster City Library, Foster City, CA
  • Litquake, San Francisco, CA
  • Porchlight Storytelling Series, San Francisco, CA
  • Malibu Jewish Center and Synagogue, Los Angeles, CA
  • New Hampshire Humanities Council, Manchester, New Hampshire
  • Osher Institute, SF State University, San Francisco, CA
  • Osher Institute, U. C. Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
  • Partnership for Education of Children in Afghanistan, St Paul, MN
  • Phi Theta Kappa Honor Society, Jackson, MS
  • World Affairs Council of San Francisco
  • Sequoia Senior Center, San Francisco, CA
  • San Francisco State Poetry Center, San Francisco, CA
  • Stanford University Student Assocation, Palo Alto, CA  
  • Harvard University Club, San Francisco, CA
  • Stanford Women’s Club, San Francisco. CA

Lecture Topics

Selected Lecture Topics

 

World History: an Alternative Story

World history as commonly taught in Western schools traces a development from Mesopotamia and Egypt, through Greece and Rome, and then to the Dark Ages, which is followed by the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution and the rise of modern democratic nations. I offer an alternative global storyline: a picture of world history as it looks if you put the Islamic world at the center.  From this perspective, the successor to Mesopotamia was Persia, the Dark Ages were the brighter ages, and the Crusades and the Mongol invasions were pivotal turning points. This talk explores the relativity of historical narratives and proposes a world historical story from a truly global perspective, a theme explored (but not exhausted) in my book Destiny Disrupted, A History of the World Through Islamic Eyes.

 

Conquering Afghanistan

Afghanistan is impossible to conquer, says conventional wisdom.  Actually, Afghanistan haas been conquered many times. It’s just that the succesful conquerors are now called Afghans. What is difficult, it seems, is conquering Afghanistan and holding it from somewhere else.  Four times in the last 180 years (or five, depending on what you’re counting) a mighty global power has undertaken this project.  The first three attempts failed and the fourth one may be in the process of foundering now. Curiously enough, the failed conquerors failed in the same way and for the same reasons. The United States failed to learn from the Soviets, the Soviets from the British, and the British from themselves! Yes, they made essentially the same mistakes in Afghanistan twice within forty years. What accounts for this amnesia? I probe this question by telling the story of the failed British and Soviet attempts to conquer Afghanistan and comparing them to the US/NATO experience of these last ten years.

 

Writing Fiction, Writing Memoir

This workshop and discussion introduces writers and writing students to the differences, similarities, and interrelationships between writing fiction and writing memoir, with a focus on strategies for discovering the story arc in real experiences and for tapping the techniques of narrative fiction to bring memoir vividly to life. I draw upon understandings I have developed during my sixteen years (and counting) of running the 65-year-old San Francisco Writer’s Workshop.

 

Living in Two Worlds: an Afghan-American Life

What was it like to grow up in Afghanistan with one foot already in America? I contrast life in a highly conservative Islamic society to that in post-modern United States and explore, along the way, such thorny topics as the chaderi (or “burqa”) and the position of women in Islamic society. Stories from a bi-cultural childhood illuminate how and why the worldview of Afghans typically differs from that of Americans. This discussion elaborates on themes touched upon in my critically-acclaimed memoir, West of Kabul, East of New York.

 

Why Afghanistan Is Difficult: Prospects and Problems

I move from a long view of Afghanistan in the context of world history to the destruction of Afghanistan in recent decades, to my own experiences in Afghanistan after the events of September 11, and finally to the current U.S. involvement in this country. In this talk, I illuminate the orgins of the Taliban and their evolution into current times, the social turmoil in the country now, and the implications of events in Afghanistan for Pakistan, Iran, the former Soviet Republics, the broader region, and, most importantly, the people of the United States.

 

Translation and Understanding “The Other”

This lecture uses poetry translation as a frame for examining the difficulty of communication across any border—cultural, historical, or personal. No message can be mapped directly from one language to another: because of the countless assumptions and understandings wedding any message to its cultural context, switching languages entails switching frameworks. Yet understanding how an entire cultural framework is involved in every word and phrase of a language also points toward ways that the West can comprehend the world as experienced by the East, that people of the twenty-first century can comprehend the world experienced by people of the past, that we as individuals can comprehend the world as seen by any other person.

 

Why Islam Has Trouble with Western Modernism

After a look at the historical unfolding of Islam in its first millenium, I explore the reformist currents of the last two centuries and the challenge that Islamic thinkers face in formulating a theology relevant to industrial modernism and yet true to Islamic traditions.  This talk introduces the ideas of Muslim modernists such as Jamaluddin al-Afghani, Sir Syed Ahmad, and Mohammed Abduh as well as the currents of thought leading to the Jihadist movements of today.  I also look at what would be involved doctrinally in shaping a modernist Islamic theology.

 

Ask Tamim

 

Betty H. asks:

Why is New York City called The Big Apple?   

New York City is called The Big Apple because it sounds so much cooler than Fun City, the dorky nickname used in all the promotional literature put out by the city’s convention and visitor’s bureau prior to the 1970s. In that decade the bureau revamped its publications, in part because the tourist industry seemed to be slumping. Someone spotted the term Fun City in the pamphlets and said, “Hey, there’s our problem right there.” (Fun City sounds exactly like something a publicity department would invent.) A search was launched for a new nickname, and that’s when someone dug up Big Apple. The term was coined in the 1920s by African American musicians who made their living moving from town to town, mostly playing little clubs and dives. Those musicians had a saying: “There are many apples on the tree, but when you pick New York City you picked the Big Apple.” That nickname was largely forgotten until the New York City Convention & Visitors Bureau dug it up and made it popular again. (Incidentally, Sacramento, California, in a moment of self-deprecation, followed suit by promoting for itself the nickname the Big Tomato. No word yet on whether any cities will be nicknaming themselves the Large Cucumber, the Plump Rice Grain, but I’ve heard Seattle is thinking of adopting the nickname the Grande Latte.   

 

Curious Kelley asks:

 

I have a friend who believes that Neil Armstrong never walked on the Moon. He says the whole thing was a hoax set up by NASA and produced in a Hollywood studio. He has two main reasons for his opinion. First: The lighting on the Space Craft was too good–every word across the entire space shuttle was perfectly legible, almost as if it was spotlighted. Two, the American flag was blowing in the wind. What wind? There is no wind on the moon. Is my friend right? Have I been gullible all these years?   

Frankly, your friend’s reasons don’t impress me. I would expect light to look different on the Moon than it does on Earth, because the Moon has no atmosphere to soften or diffuse it. With no atmospheric distortion, the letters on the spacecraft would look sharper and clearer than anything filmed on Earth. As for the flag, I assume NASA supplied Armstrong with a flag made of some stiff material that would hold its shape, so that when he stepped onto the Moon, the stars and stripes would show. I mean, let’s face it–those guys were rocket scientists. If the Moon shot were faked, think how many people would have had to have been in on the conspiracy. (Watch the credits next time you see a film that has a lot of special effects.) Think about what a great story this would be for some journalist. Then calculate how many journalists are crawling around out there, looking for a story. Then consider how much the tabloids might pay for such a story. Do you mean to tell me that in all these 30-something years, for that kind of money, no one has spilled the beans? People walking on the Moon I can believe, but this other idea? No way am I that gullible!   

 

Len M. asks:

 

If you’re going in and out of a room, is it more cost-efficient to flip the light switch on and off or to leave the light on until you’re done with that room?   

Computing energy efficiency is always a tricky business because you have to take hidden costs into account. Here, you’d have to take into account the fact that a regular light bulb wears out faster if you keep switching it on and off. Even so, according to my power company, it’s more cost-effective to turn a light off when you leave a room if you’re going to be gone any longer than a minute. I don’t know how this computation will change after all our lightbulbs are that LED kind, which use about 2% of the wattage of the old, incandescent kind that will no longer be sold after 2012. I think the minute might be extended to a couple of hours at that point, because the cost of making those light bulbs—depending as they will on precious rare-earth elements—will be so much higher than the cost of running them.   

 

Brenda R. asks:

How much is a cow worth? I was driving past a meadow one day, I saw thirty cows, and there was no one guarding them. Anyone could have taken one.  How many dollars are thirty cows worth?      

Well, Brenda, the answer to your question depends on the market.  In a bear market, a cow isn’t worth anything, because a cow isn’t a bear.  In a bull market, you can get $2,400 or more for your animal, provided your animal is a bull. In the less well-known cow-market, it’s up to $2,000 for a beef cow but $500 -$800 tops for a dairy cow: go figger.            

This animal sells for $3,000.
This one? A mere $800.

  

Incidentally, I was talking to a woman in Washington State recently who raises rodeo horses.  How much does one of them sell for, I asked.  “Oh,” she said, “anywhere from 15 to 25 thousand for a good one. ” Think about that next time you driving past a corral with 30 radio horses browsing around, munching on grass!    

Ann L. asks:
Why are bluejays blue? Aren’t they eating the same worms and bugs as sparrows? Also, why do many birds have such bright plumage? Don’t the bright colors make them easier for predators to spot? If that’s so, how come evolution hasn’t weeded out this trait? 

Sparrows don’t look blue because “you look like what you eat” isn’t a reliable rule in nature.   If it were, cows would look green and babies chalk-white. Also, wolves would like sheep and patrons of Carl’s Jr. like messy hamburgers. As for the bright plumage, only the males have those adornments in most species. The females generally have boring feathers that make them blend in with the shrubbery. The thing is, the bottom line in evolution by natural selectionis the passing on of ones genes.  So it’s not just about surviving predators; it’s also about getting more chances to mate. Bright feathers make the males easier for predators to spot, but it also gets them noticed mor easily by the females. And that’s important because in nature, females can get by with cunning and strength, but for males, it’s a jungle out there, and in the long run only the pretty survive.

Nine Underrated Inventions

The Nine Most Underrated Inventions

 

“Great inventions.”

Typically that phrase refers to big ticket items. One thinks of dazzling intellectual breakthroughs:  the telescope, the steam engine, the airplane, the wheel…

And those were all tremendous, of course.

But often, it’s some mundane little device that changes history. It might be no more than a slight improvement on some earlier invention. If it intersects with a historical moment, it can become a pivot. Then, like the lever that lifts the elephant, it produces consequences far out of proportion to the ingenuity of the thing itself.

I’ve drawn up a list of nine such items. There might be better examples, but any such list illustrates, I think, the way our lives are interwoven (almost creepily) with the things we make.

The Chariot  The wheel was great. The cart followed from the wheel and it was great too. But the chariot? That’s just a two-wheeled cart. How hard was it to think of four minus two? And how consequential could that have been? The fact is, the chariot had an immense effect on history. Here’s how. In ancient times, the world of farms, towns, cities, workshops and governments—the “civilized world” —was a belt of territory stretching from the Indus River to Asia Minor. These folks had the cart, which is useful mainly for going straight: it can’t turn quickly. North of the civilized belt lived a nomadic people, now remembered as the Indo-Europeans. They invented the chariot, which was really just a basket slung between two big wheels, but it was light enough for a horse to pull, and it could pivot as no four-wheeled vehicle could. The horse-drawn chariot gave the Indo-Europeans a crucial military advantage over the sedentary farmers. It keyed their expansion into India, Persia, Mesopotamia, Greece, and Italy, where they overwhelmed and replaced the original inhabitants. That’s why English, French, Italian, Greek, Persian, Hindi, and so many other tongues all belong to the same group, the Indo-European family of languages. Most of us from America to India are descended from those nomads.

Concrete Some might say concrete wasn’t an invention because it already existed in nature. That’s like saying the airplane wasn’t an invention because birds could already fly. The Romans figured out how to make artificial concrete by mixing lime, sand, and bits of broken rock with a certain pink volcanic ash. Then they reinforced it with bronze rods. This invention had a precious property: it set and hardened when wet—even under water. Reinforced concrete could span distances, as bricks and stones never could. Using concrete, Romans could build sea walls to protect coastal towns. They could bridge just about any waterway. Rome’s conquest of the world and its ability to hold its conquests together rested largely on its ability to build walls, bridges, roads, aqueducts, and monumental buildings. Concrete was the key to all that. The rule of law is often called Rome’s greatest contribution to civilization, and maybe so, but concrete has to come in a close second.

Horse Collar In medieval Europe, the collar that attached an animal to a plow had flat straps that pulled across the animal’s chest. Because of the way a horse is built, these straps pressed against the horse’s jugular vein, rendered it incapable of pulling a plow. Farmers, therefore, used slow-moving oxen. Then someone invented a collar with softer straps that distributed the weight a bit differently. This tiny innovation allowed the same familiar collar to be used on horses. Horses work roughly fifty percent faster than oxen. Using horses (and a slightly improved plow) peasant farmers could suddenly produce a surplus. A surplus gave them goods to trade at crossroads markets on weekends. Markets soon turned into towns. Towns meant some folks could give up farming and just make goods for sale. A proliferation of such goods meant some people could live purely by buying and selling. You see where this is leading—the horse collar played a pivotal role in ending the feudal system and launching the rise of Europe.

Longbow When people think of major military inventions, they usually think of the gun, which did key the European conquest and colonization of Africa and the Americas. But if you want to talk about a weapon that triggered the greatest historical change in the least amount of time, the longbow gets my vote. The longbow changed history on three specific days in 1346, 1356, and 1415. On those days, English and French armies clashed at Crecy, Poitiers, and Agincourt. Why was the longbow so important? Because it enabled leather-clad English commoners to defeat iron-clad French knights. Throughout medieval times, a European army consisted fundamentally of armored noblemen on armored horses. These living tanks personally won or lost battles, and that’s what made nobles noble. At Crecy, Poitiers, and Agincourt, the French army had roughly three times as many knights as the English, but the English army had archers armed with a new kind of bow. It differed from the old kind of bow only in length. But that extra length gave it just enough power to shoot some hundred feet further and pierce armor. Just like that, the armored knight was finished as a significant element in war. From this time forward, power began shifting from the armored class to the moneyed class—which soon came to include merchants, manufacturers, and bankers.

Eyeglasses Reading glasses were invented in Italy about 1350 and eyeglasses that corrected near- and far-sightedness around 1450. Isn’t that just about when the Renaissance began? All right, this is pure speculation, but I know one thing. I have an affliction considered trivial today: I’m myopic. If I were living before eyeglasses, I would be considered blind. My job would be to sit by a road with a begging cup. Roughly 25% of the people in North America are nearsighted like me. I wonder how many potential writers, artists, scientists, inventors, philosophers, and the like never grew their talents because they lived before the invention of eyeglasses? How many seminal intellectual feats since the invention of eyeglasses were achieved by people who wore glasses?

Rotary Printing Press Johannes Gutenberg invented the flatbed printing press in 1450. His invention remained basically unchanged until 1827. That year, the steam powered rotary printing press was invented, which printed from a single continuous roll of paper. The best flatbed press could print about 125 pages an hour; the new device could do about 18,000. At the time, no one needed that many copies of anything that fast, but invention is the mother of necessity. In 1833, a New Yorker named Benjamin Day decided to print a newspaper so cheap that at least 10,000 people a day could afford it: he would profit on volume. But—what could he possibly put in a newspaper that 10,000 people a day would want to read? That’s when Day’s newspaper the Daily Sun (and soon a host of imitators) invented…news. Before this time, “news” was whatever gossip drifted past a person’s ear. Mass-newspapers, however, had to find events to report every day or they’d go broke. Spotting events of the greatest interest to the greatest number emerged as a skill. This was the first step toward mass culture, mass media, mass opinion, mass movements, and “the mass” in general.

Barbed Wire In 1870, the American Midwest teemed with wild cattle, which cowboys collected and herded to railroad stations to sell for meat and hides. The land was “open range,” belonging to no one: any herder could graze his cattle on any pasture. Branding kept herds private. Farmers tried to settle here, but they couldn’t fence out the cattle, wood being scarce and walls of sod being laborious to build. Then in 1874, barbed wire was invented: Joseph Glidden took out the basic patent, and by 1880, he was selling over 80 million pounds of barbed wire every year. “Devil’s wire” was cheap and easy to string and it quickly divided the open range into private plots. Farmers could then move in. By 1900, the entire Midwest was on its way to becoming the nation’s granary. Cowboys and the Old West had moved from the prairies into those deep crannies of the American psyche where myths are stored..

Carborundum Perhaps you’ve heard of carborundum. It’s an industrial abrasive consisting of silicon carbide. Okay, probably you haven’t heard of carborundum. Invented in 1893 by Edward Goodrich, this invention made possible the mass production of precision-ground interchangeable metal parts. You need carborundum to make machines used in a factories to make other complex machines. Most of us will never find a use for carborundum in our daily lives, but we wouldn’t have cars, cameras, or CAT-scan machines without it. That is why the United States Patent Office called carborundum one of twenty-two American inventions most responsible for the industrial age of the twentieth century.

Bakelite  All right, I’m cheating a little here. Few have heard of Bakelite, because Bakelite is no longer made. What we’re really talking about here is something bigger. Bakelite, invented in 1907, was the world’s first plastic. By the 1920s, it was everywhere. The invention of one plastic inspired the search for others. World War II gave intense impetus to this research. After the cataclysm, Bakelite gave way to Lucite, fiberglass, nylon, and many others. It’s all plastic, though, and plastic has two salient features. It can take any shape, and it never decomposes. It has therefore shaped, literally, the way our (designed) world looks, and it has magnified the waste disposal problem to a scale the ancients never imagined.

Traditionally a list like this has ten items, and I could go on. Consider the adhesive postage stamp. (It led to the concept of prepaid mail delivery.) Consider the electromagnet. (It led to the telegraph.) Consider the tin can. And then consider the aluminum one. And then consider the pop-top beer can.

Okay, maybe don’t consider that one.

Because here’s the thing, of course: the closer you come to the present, the larger small things loom. It gets ever harder to identify which inventions had the hugest impact on history—because less and less history lies downstream from the invention.

If I had to add one device from the last twenty years to my list, for example, I might pick the cell phone. There’s no telling what the consequences will be of a device that enables people to remain in touch while on the move. And of course, the cell phone quickly stopped being a phone. Just like the telegraph (once invented) it quickly expanded into a myriad subsidiary inventions that revolutionized communication. The operative phrase is “no telling.” That’s the thing about historically pivotal inventions: we can’t really know what they are—only what they were.